Current Depth Chart for next year and our possible depth chart for next year
by seton hall and steelers on Mar 22, 2011 3:30 PM EDT
Email
Print
This is what our depth chart is for next year and I will also post what I think the final depth chart will be
PG: JT, Grennan, Wilson
SG: Cosby, Karlis
SF: Edwin, Auda
PF: Pope, Auda, Okoloji
C: Geramipoor, Hill
Despite some rumors, I think that Okoloji will stay and try to get playing time and I think Hill will be eligible for next year. Now, we still have 2 scholarships to give out. I think those scholarships will go to Ryan Rhoomes, PF and Guy Landry, SG. That makes our depth chart for next year:
PG: JT, Grennan, Wilson
SG: Cosby, Landry, Karlis
SF, Edwin, Auda
PF: Pope, Okoloji, Rhoomes
C: Geramipoor, Hill
I believe that either Grennan or Wilson will redshirt. I think it would be Grennan so he can spend a year adding strength and speed. I also think their is a possibility that Rhoomes or Karlis would red shirt as well. I think, since it looks like Willard likes shooters and Karlis is a shooter, he would end up redshirting Rhoomes. That would leave our depth chart as:
PG: JT, Wilson
SG: Cosby, Landry, Karlis
SF: Edwin Auda
PF: Pope, Okoloji, Auda
C: Geramipoor, Hill
I think this gives us a very deep and balanced team. Here is how I think the scoring would go:
1. Fuquan Edwin: 15.2ppg
2. Herb Pope: 13.9ppg
3. Jordan Theodore: 11.1ppg
4. Aaron Cosby: 9.8ppg
5. Patrik Auda: 6.5ppg
6. Guy Landry: 5.8ppg
7. Freddie Wilson: 5.1ppg
8. Anali Okoloji: 4.2ppg
9. Isaiah Hill: 3.1ppg
10. Aaron Geramipoor: 2.0ppg
11. Harald Karlis: 1.6ppg
Total PPG: 78.3ppg
I don't think Karlis would play many minutes in this depth chart. He would probably only get like 5 to 6 minutes a game. What I like about an 11 man rotation is that we will be able to press a lot more since we will just rotate players in and out. This is what Mike Rice is going to do at Rutgers and I think Willard would probably do it as well. If this lineup can play the same defense as the 2010 group, then we can be a very successful team. I think the 4 main scorers will be a very dynamic group. Fuquan will get most of his points in the paint and mid range but will probably get a 3pt shot a game as well. Pope will get his points in the paint. I think Jordan's scoring will come from a mix of drives and 3pt shots and I think the same for Cosby.
This FanPost was made by a member of the South Orange Juice community and is to be treated as the opinions and views of its author, not that of the blogger or blog community as a whole.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
JT and Fuq
I think you got them mixed between each other, as a point guard over the past few years at Seton Hall (with the exception of Eugene Harvey) you gotta expect to score at least 13-14 points a game as a senior. I cant see Fuq scoring 15 points next season, I can JT doing that instead, I think JT will score 15 and Fuq will settle for 11-12 points…
How about Auda scoring more than 6, i think he will be the most improved player for us, Europeans learn fast, I can see him scoring 10 points a game…what you think…
I think Auda could average 10 ppg if he was given the time
but he will either be behind Pope at PF or behind Fuquan at SF. I think he will be a good player and have some big games but I don’t see him getting double figures per game until his Junior year. Also, I think Jordan will score 11 but I think he will also get like 5 to 7 assists per game.
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com/
Big Ben: 2 super bowl victories
Joe Flacco: 0 super bowl appearances
Mark Sanchez: 0 super bowl appearances
So for those of you who say Flacco and Sanchez are better postseason QB's than Big Ben because they have more road wins, go home and think about how dumb that reasoning is.
by seton hall and steelers on Mar 23, 2011 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Ajayi
you gotta also wait for the upcoming class, what if Ajayi comes in? or what if Karlis is better than expected? what if he is the next Rimas Kaukenas?
I agree with you on Fuquan, he should be the catalyst of next year’s team. I also agree on the defense. One thing they need to do offensively next year is have better sets more consistently and drive more consistently than they were this year.
Sportscaster, 89.5 FM WSOU
Sports Journalist, The Setonian
by Brandon Biskobing on Mar 24, 2011 11:01 AM EDT reply actions
Auda is by no means a SF
He’s a face-up 4, but not a 3 at all.
It might be better just to lump all the wing players together- in terms of positions, they aren’t as rigid anymore in college basketball, and you very well may see a lot of 3-guard sets next year with the guards coming in having similar sizes.
So,
PG- Theodore, Wilson
Wings- Cosby, Grennan, Karlis, Edwin, Landry (possibly)
I put Grennan in the wings category because of his shooting ability only. IDK if he’ll step in and play backup point right away. IDK that about Wilson either, but you know how Willard loves his shooters to be in a position to shoot.
Twitter: @JPGuerette
Email: jason.guerette@student.shu.edu
Auda could play a wing if we wanted to go big
I could see a lineup of JT, Cosby Auda, Pope, and Hill/Geramipoor being used at times.
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com/
Big Ben: 2 super bowl victories
Joe Flacco: 0 super bowl appearances
Mark Sanchez: 0 super bowl appearances
So for those of you who say Flacco and Sanchez are better postseason QB's than Big Ben because they have more road wins, go home and think about how dumb that reasoning is.
by seton hall and steelers on Mar 24, 2011 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions
Only if he improves his handle 1000% over the offseason.
Right now, Auda looks awkward and a bit out-of-place on the perimeter with the dribble.
Twitter: @JPGuerette
Email: jason.guerette@student.shu.edu
agreed. I prefer him as a face up 4 but if Willard wants to go big for maybe 5 minutes a game I could see him as our 3. It is not like we have a set 3 but
he would be a matchup night-mare. If I was Kevin Willard, when we were playing a small team, I would play a lineup of JT, Fuquan, Auda, Pope, and Hill/Geramipoor for at least 5 minutes of the game and play a 2-3 zone and just pound the other teams in the paint.
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com/
Big Ben: 2 super bowl victories
Joe Flacco: 0 super bowl appearances
Mark Sanchez: 0 super bowl appearances
So for those of you who say Flacco and Sanchez are better postseason QB's than Big Ben because they have more road wins, go home and think about how dumb that reasoning is.
by seton hall and steelers on Mar 24, 2011 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I agree with Steelers, Auda showed signs of an outside game at the end of the season and if he could improve his ball handling he could be a nightmare for opposing SF’s
Sportscaster, 89.5 FM WSOU
Sports Journalist, The Setonian
by Brandon Biskobing on Mar 25, 2011 8:51 PM EDT reply actions
Aaric Murray
We should pursue Murray from La Salle…he will be sitting out for one year but he will be ready when Pope is gone…he is a great player..reminds me of Eddy Griffin…Rutgers, St John are already talking to him…why are we not doing the same?
he said Kentucky is his favorite. Rutgers and SJU have no scholarships left so he won't be going there
He said that WVU is also next on his list.
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com/
Big Ben: 2 super bowl victories
Joe Flacco: 0 super bowl appearances
Mark Sanchez: 0 super bowl appearances
So for those of you who say Flacco and Sanchez are better postseason QB's than Big Ben because they have more road wins, go home and think about how dumb that reasoning is.
by seton hall and steelers on Mar 30, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions
2012
it s not a scholarship issue…this is due for 2012…
Rutgers has no room for Murray. They said so themselves. SJU has one scholarship for 2012 so I doubt they will use it on him instead of a top 100 player in the ESPNU
My Seton Hall blog: http://thesetonhallblog.blogspot.com/
My Steelers blog: thenewsteelcurtain.blogspot.com/
Big Ben: 2 super bowl victories
Joe Flacco: 0 super bowl appearances
Mark Sanchez: 0 super bowl appearances
So for those of you who say Flacco and Sanchez are better postseason QB's than Big Ben because they have more road wins, go home and think about how dumb that reasoning is.
by seton hall and steelers on Mar 31, 2011 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
Related FanPosts on South Orange Juice
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
